[00:00:01]
ADDRESS ANY QUESTIONS THAT COME UP I THINK. YEAH. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING. I WOULD LIKE TO
[BUSINESS SESSION]
WELCOME YOU TO THE SEPTEMBER 23RD, 2025 MEETING OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION. BEFORE WE BEGIN, I WILL OUTLINE THE PROCEDURE THAT WE WILL FOLLOW FOR OUR PUBLIC HEARING. AS EACH AGENDA ITEM IS CALLED, THE APPLICANT OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVES AND PEOPLE FOR THE REQUEST WILL BE ALLOWED TO SPEAK, THEN PEOPLE AGAINST THE REQUEST WILL BE ALLOWED TO SPEAK. THERE'S OPPOSITION TO THE REQUEST. THE APPLICANT WILL BE ALLOWED TO MAKE A SHORT REBUTTAL. ALL PEOPLE WISHING TO SPEAK NEED TO COME TO THE MICROPHONE AT THE FRONT OF THE ROOM, AND PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. FOR THE RECORD, ALL STATEMENTS MADE SHOULD BE RELEVANT TO THE AGENDA ITEM AND BE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES. THERE ARE SEVERAL PEOPLE IN FAVOR OPPOSED TO REQUEST. WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO ALLOW 1 OR 2 PEOPLE TO ACT AS SPOKESPERSON FOR THE GROUP. PUBLIC DISCOURSE IS VERY IMPORTANT TO THE COMMISSION. WE HAVE TO MAINTAIN ORDER IN THE MEETINGS THAT ALL PEOPLE MAY BE HEARD AND CITY BUSINESS MAY BE CONDUCTED. SO DIRECTED BY ME, THE SERGEANT AT ARMS REMOVED FROM THIS MEETING, ANYBODY THAT BECOMES UNRULY OR PREVENTS US FROM CONDUCTING AN ORDERLY MEETING. THE COMMISSION MEMBERS HAVE REVIEWED EACH OF THESE ITEMS IN A PREVIOUS WORK SESSION THAT WAS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. THE RECOMMENDATIONS WE MAKE TONIGHT WILL BE BASED ON THE WORK SESSION, AS WELL AS ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PRESENTED TONIGHT. AFTER COMPLETING THE HEARING ON EACH ITEM, THE COMMISSION WILL CONSIDER ACTION IN THE ACTION TAKEN NIGHT ON ALL ITEMS, EXCLUDING PLOTS, WILL BE IN THE FORM OF A RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL. CITY COUNCIL WILL ALSO CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARINGS ON AGENDA ITEMS, EXCLUDING PLOTS, ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 21ST, 2025,[MINUTES]
IN THE BOSQUE THEATER OF THE WACO CONVENTION CENTER AT 100 WASHINGTON AVENUE. THE FIRST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA TONIGHT IS THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF OUR AUGUST 26TH, 2025 WORK SESSION. AS IN BUSINESS MEETINGS, ARE THERE ANY CHANGES OR ADDITIONS? OKAY. SEEING NONE,[PUBLIC HEARINGS]
THEY WILL STAND APPROVED AS WRITTEN. FIRST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA TONIGHT IS ZONING APPLICATION Z DASH 25 DASH 38 FOR THE CITY STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION. YES, SIR. MR. CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ON A REQUEST FROM CHRISTOPHER WALKER TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM MIXED USE FLEX TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL OFFICE, FLEX AND REZONE FROM C THREE GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO R-2 TWO FAMILY ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT ON APPROXIMATELY 0.1164 ACRES.DESCRIBED AS LOT B, ONE BLOCK 36 OF THE FARWELL HEIGHTS ADDITION, KNOWN AS 2924 NORTH 19TH STREET. PLANNING SERVICES, RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE LAND USE CHANGE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS. THE EXISTING PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE IS SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT THE ZONING DISTRICTS PERMITTED UNDER THE PROPOSED MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL OFFICE FLEX, AND THAT THE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTS OFFICE FLEX LAND USE IS PRESENT IN THE SURROUNDING AREA, INDICATING COMPATIBILITY WITH EXISTING LAND USES. PLANNING SERVICES ALSO RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE ZONING CHANGE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS. PROPOSED ZONING ALIGNS WITH THE LAND USE COMPONENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE PROPOSED ZONING BRINGS THE PROPERTY INTO CONFORMANCE WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING LOT SIZE REQUIREMENTS. THE EXISTING PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE IS ADEQUATE TO PROVIDE TO ACCOMMODATE THE USES PERMITTED IN R-2 DISTRICT. THE PROPOSED REZONING SUPPORTS THE GOALS OF WACO STRATEGIC HOUSING PLAN BY INCREASING THE SUPPLY OF RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTIES, AND R-2 ZONING IS THE DOMINANT RESIDENTIAL ZONING IN THE SURROUNDING AREA. THANK YOU. IS THE APPLICANT OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVE HERE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THIS ITEM? PLEASE JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. BRITTANY WALKER, 22 NORTH SHORE CIRCLE, WACO, TEXAS. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR GIVING ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TO YOU THIS EVENING. SO WE ARE REQUESTING FOR THIS TO BE REZONED TO R-2. EVERYTHING IN THE AREA IS R-2. WE'RE PLANNING ON PUTTING A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENT ON THERE. WE ALSO OWN THE LOT NEXT TO IT. SO THAT IS ALSO GOING TO HAVE A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENT ON IT. WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR THE CITY TO BRING IN UTILITIES. WE'RE PLANNING ON DOING THAT OURSELVES FOR BOTH OF THE LOTS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THIS ITEM? ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THIS ITEM? HEARING NONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ENTERTAIN A MOTION MOVE THAT WE RECOMMEND.
APPROVAL OF THE LAND USE CHANGE AND ZONING CHANGE BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS. SECOND MOTION BY MR. SMITH. SECOND BY MR. ALLEN. PLEASE PULL THE COMMISSION. ALLEN. JAY. ELLIS.
YES. EMERY. YES. INGRAM. YES. LOZANO. YES. RODRIGUEZ. YES. SALOME. YES. SMITH. YES. COLE.
YES. MOVING ON TO ITEM Z. DASH 25. DASH 39. WHAT IS CITY STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION? YES, SIR. MR. CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ON REQUEST FROM JONATHAN CANNON OF WALKER PARTNERS, ON BEHALF OF GORDON SWANSON, TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL OFFICE FLEX TO MIXED USE FLEX AND REZONE FROM
[00:05:03]
R3. B MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT AND R3 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT TO C2 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ON APPROXIMATELY 10.12 ACRES ALONG TOWN OF SPRING ROAD AND PARKER SPRINGS DRIVE, AND TO REZONE ON APPROXIMATELY 18.125 ACRES ALONG SALEM WAY AND PARKER SPRINGS DRIVE FROM R-1 SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT, R3 MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT AND R-3 MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT TO R-3 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT COMBINED PROPERTIES BEING ALL OF LOT TWO, BLOCK 11 OF THE WILLOW BEND EDITION PART TWO, KNOWN AS TEN ZERO ZERO 22 PARKER SPRINGS DRIVE. PLAN AND SERVICES DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE LAND USE DESIGNATION CHANGE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS. THE EXISTING PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE IS SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT THE ZONING DISTRICTS PERMITTED UNDER THE PROPOSED MIXED USE LAND USE DESIGNATION, AND THAT MIXED USE LAND USE IS PRESENT IN THE SURROUNDING AREA, INDICATING COMPATIBILITY WITH EXISTING LAND USES. PLANNING SERVICES ALSO RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE ZONING CHANGES BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS. PROPOSED ZONING REQUESTS ALIGNED WITH THE LAND USE COMPONENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS RECOMMENDED FOR AMENDMENT. THE PROPERTY MEETS ALL THE AREA AND WIDTH REQUIREMENTS FOR C2 AND R3 ZONING. AS PROPOSED, THE EXISTING PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE IS ADEQUATE TO ACCOMMODATE USES PERMITTED IN THE C2, R3 ZONING DISTRICTS, AND THEN FINALLY, THE DENSITY AND BUILDING HEIGHT PERMITTED IN THE EXISTING R3, WHICH IS 40 UNITS AN ACRE AND UNLIMITED HEIGHT, IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING AREA. USES AND ZONING. THE PROPOSED C2 AND R3 ZONING, WHICH HAS A 25 UNIT ACRE AND 35 FOOT MAXIMUM HEIGHT, ENABLE A MIX OF COMPATIBLE COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES, RESPECTIVELY. THE PROPOSED C2 ZONING ALONG CHINA SPRING HIGHWAY FOLLOWS A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ALONG THE CORRIDOR, WITH A BUFFER FROM THE RESIDENTIAL FROM THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. THANK YOU. IS THE APPLICANT OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVE HERE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF? I'M JONATHAN CANNON WITH WALKER PARTNERS, CIVIL ENGINEER ON THE PROJECT, AND MY ADDRESS IS 823 WASHINGTON AVENUE. AND I'D BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY TODAY. OKAY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THANKS. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THIS ITEM? IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THIS ITEM? OKAY. HEARING NONE, WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ENTERTAIN A MOTION. MR. CHAIR, I MOVE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL ON BOTH. CAN WE TAKE BOTH, CLINT? WE'RE DOING BOTH ON THE ON THE LANE CHANGE AND THE ZONING CHANGE. MOTION BY MR. EMERY, SECOND BY MR. SMITH. PLEASE PULL THE COMMISSION. ALLEN. ELLIS. YES. EMERY. YES.INGRAM. YES. LOZANO. YES. RODRIGUEZ. YES. SALOME. YES. SMITH. YES. COLE. YES. MOVING ON TO OUR HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION ITEM. WHAT IS CITY STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION? YES, SIR. MR. CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, THIS IS A REQUEST FOR HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION. THE MARJORIE AND PHILIP SANGER HOUSE ON PROPERTY, DESCRIBED AS LOT 22, BLOCK A, THE CEDAR OAKS ADDITION, KNOWN AS 3600 MACARTHUR DRIVE. PLAINTIFF SERVICES RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. THE REQUEST FOR DESIGNATION BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS. IT POSSESSES SIGNIFICANCE WITH RESPECT TO HISTORY, CULTURE, AND ARCHITECTURE, WITH A DEMONSTRABLE CULTURAL ASSOCIATION AS REPRESENTING NOT LIMITED TO, THE INTERNATIONAL ARCHITECTURAL STYLE SINGER FAMILY, WACO JEWISH HISTORY, POSTWAR AMERICAN HOME DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURAL FIRM OF FARR AND GRANGER IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE LIVES OF PERSONS SIGNIFICANT LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE, NATIONAL, AND INTERNATIONAL HISTORY. AS A 70 PLUS YEAR HOME OF MARJORIE SINGER, WHO'S DEDICATED HER LIFE TO THE WACO COMMUNITY, WAS A MEMBER OF THE PROMINENT SANGER FAMILY, WHICH HAS A PROMINENT INFLUENCE IN WACO, BOTH IN THE LOCAL JEWISH COMMUNITY AND THROUGHOUT THE OPERATION OF THE SANGER BROTHERS DEPARTMENT STORE. IT EMBODIES THE DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF A TYPE PERIOD AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION, IS A WELL PRESERVED RESIDENCE OF INTERNATIONAL ARCHITECTURAL STYLE, WHICH TOOK INFLUENCE AFTER WORLD WAR TWO. IN MID-CENTURY ENGINEERING ADVANCEMENTS. IT REPRESENTS THE WORK OF A MASTER DESIGN BUILDER AND CRAFTSMAN AS WORK OF WELL KNOWN AUSTIN ARCHITECT FIRM OF FEHR AND GRANGER, WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR SIGNIFICANT PROJECTS SUCH AS ROBERT MUELLER AIRPORT AND WESTWOOD COUNTRY CLUB IN AUSTIN, AND IT REPRESENTS A DISTINCTIVE AND FAMILIAR VISUAL FEATURE. THAT CITY IS ONE OF THE ONLY TWO HOUSES BUILT BY FEHR AND GRANGER, AND AS ONE OF ONLY THREE HOUSES BUILT OUTSIDE OF AUSTIN BY GRANGER. THIS RECOMMENDATION ALSO COMES TO YOU FROM OUR HISTORIC LANDMARK PRESERVATION COMMISSION. THANK YOU. IS THE APPLICANT OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVE HERE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THIS ITEM? IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK
[00:10:04]
IN OPPOSITION TO THIS ITEM? OKAY. HEARING NONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ENTERTAIN A MOTION MOVE THAT WE APPROVE BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS. SECOND MOTION BY MR. SMITH.SECOND BY MR. INGRAM. PLEASE PULL THE COMMISSION. ALAN ELLIS. YES. EMBRY. YES. INGRAM. YES.
LOZANO. YES. RODRIGUEZ. YES. SALOME. YES. SMITH. YES. COLE. YES. MOVING ON TO ITEM 20 5-4.
WHAT IS CITY STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION? YES, SIR. MR. CHAIR, MEMBERS, THE COMMISSION.
THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ON REQUEST FROM JACOB WATER AND JUSTIN MARKHAM FROM BLACKLAND SURVEYING LLC, FOR THE ABANDONMENT OF THE REMAINDER OF MORRIS AVENUE AND VARIABLE WIDTH ALLEY, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 0.049 ACRES LOCATED AT THE TWO CHAMBERS OF THE SURVEY. ABSTRACT NUMBER SEVEN, MCLENNAN COUNTY, TEXAS LOCATED WITHIN THE BLOCK SITUATED BETWEEN STREET AND TREE AVENUE AND SOUTH 11TH AND SOUTH 12TH STREET. STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE ABANDONMENT BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS. THOSE. THE ALLEY ABANDONMENT TRACT IS UNDEVELOPED AND IS NOT CURRENTLY BEING USED AS AN ALLEY. FOLLOWING ABANDONMENT, THE PROPERTY WILL WOULD BE REPLANTED WITH THE ADJACENT PARCELS TO CREATE A DEVELOPABLE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY PROMOTING INFILL DEVELOPMENT. THE ABANDONMENT OF THE ALLEY RIGHT OF WAY WILL NOT NEGATIVELY IMPACT UTILITY ACCESS FOR SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, OR HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON SURROUNDING STREET AND ALLEY SYSTEM. WE DO HAVE THREE CONDITIONS ONE. PRIOR TO CITY COUNCIL ACTION, A SURVEY SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT SHOWS THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING UTILITY LINES WITH THE ABANDONMENT AREA PRIOR TO PROCESSING THE QUITCLAIM DEEDS EASEMENTS SHALL BE RETAINED AND RECORDED FOR ANY KNOWN UTILITIES WITHIN THE ABANDONMENT ABANDONMENT AREA, OR THE UTILITIES MAY BE RELOCATED AT DEVELOPER'S EXPENSE AS COORDINATED WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY PROVIDER, AND THAT EASEMENTS SHALL BE RETAINED AND RECORDED FOR ANY UTILITIES DISCOVERED DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ABANDONMENT AREA, OR THE UTILITIES MAY BE RELOCATED AT DEVELOPER'S EXPENSE AS COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY PROVIDER.
THANK YOU. IS THE APPLICANT OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVES HERE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THIS ITEM? IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THIS ITEM? YES. PLEASE JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. HI, MY NAME IS PAMELA FARROW. I LIVE AT 2028 SOUTH 12TH STREET. I'M THE ONE THAT'S IN FRONT OF THE PROPERTY THAT MR. DOZIER HAS. AND I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT THEY WERE GOING TO ABANDON THE ALLEY, THAT HE ALREADY HAS A FENCE AFTER HIS FIRST FEW BUILDINGS. HE HAS FOUR BUILDINGS THERE. HE HAS PUT A FENCE WHERE THE ALLEY ORIGINALLY WAS, AND THEY ARE REDIRECTING WHERE ALLEY HAS NEVER BEEN. SO WHEN I CAME HOME AFTER THE MEETING THAT WE HAD ON, I THINK IT WAS TWO WEEKS AGO. THEY HAD TOLD ME THAT THEY WOULD GET ME FIVE FEET OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. SO I SEE ON MY FENCE THERE'S A PINK, THERE'S TWO PINK FLAGS AND ONE GREEN FLAG. SO I'M JUST TRYING TO FIGURE OUT IF THAT'S GOING TO BE THE THEY'RE GOING TO BRING THAT ALLEY OVER. IF THEY'RE GOING TO TAKE SOME OF MY PROPERTY TO ADJUST FOR HIS PROPERTY, BECAUSE HE'S GOT TO GIVE SOME EASEMENT FROM WHERE THAT ORIGINAL FENCE IS THAT HE'S JUST PUT UP, OR HOW IS THIS REALLY SUPPOSED TO GO? BECAUSE I WAS IN FAVOR FOR HIM ABANDONING IF IT WAS ABANDONING BETWEEN HE AND MY COUSIN, WHICH I HAD TOLD Y'ALL BEFORE. SO AT THE DEVELOPER IS COMING IN AND HE'S TAKING PROPERTY FROM THE LANDOWNER THAT'S ALREADY THERE. AND THEN THEY BROUGHT IN A A TRAIL OF DIRT, I MEAN, A TRUCK OF DIRT, A LOAD, AND IT HAD ROCKS AND DEBRIS IN IT AND WHICH HAS MADE A A LITTLE HILL.
IT'S NOT A HILL, BUT IT'S IT'S DEEP ENOUGH TO WHERE IT MAKES IT. THERE'S SOME WATER. IT'S GOING TO RUN OFF ONTO MY PROPERTY. I'VE NEVER HAD WATER RUNOFF. SORRY. NEVER HAD WATER RUNOFF. NEVER HAD ANY WATER STANDING IN MY YARD. BUT NOW IT'S GOING TO OCCUR BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T FLATTEN OUT THE DIRT. THEY BROUGHT IN AN EXTRA TRUCK OF DIRT. SO I'M HAVING A PROBLEM WITH IT. AND ESPECIALLY WHEN A FAMILY FRIEND CAME AND SAID, NO, THAT'S THE ALLEY THAT'S COMING ACROSS THE STREET. WELL, THE ALLEY NEVER CAME ACROSS BECAUSE PHILLIPS MORTUARY OR DIERKS OR WHOEVER IT IS, NEVER USED THAT THEY GOT A GATE THAT'S CLOSING THEIRS.
SO I NEED SOME EXPLANATION. I NEED SOMETHING I DON'T WANT THE DEVELOPER TO THINK THAT I'M TRYING TO STOP HIM FROM BUILDING. I BELIEVE IN PROGRESS, BUT NOT AT MY EXPENSE. I APPRECIATE Y'ALL LISTENING. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. CITY STAFF, WOULD YOU LIKE TO
[00:15:02]
PROVIDE ANY COMMENT RIGHT NOW OR WOULD IT BE EASIER TO THIS FOR AFTER THE SESSION? YES. I DON'T THINK THE APPLICANT IS HERE, BUT WE CAN DEFINITELY COORDINATE, MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S NOT ANY ISSUES WITH DEVELOPING THE PROPERTY AND HAVING ANY IMPACT ON SURROUNDING THE SURROUNDING LOTS, THAT THE INTENT OF THIS ABANDONMENT IS THAT HALF OF IT WOULD GO TO BOTH SIDES OF THE BOTH THE BOTH OWNERS OF THE ALLEY. SO AND THEY'RE NOT GOING TO BE BUILDING ANY NEW ALLEY THERE. IT'S TO DEVELOP THE PROPERTY. THERE'S THERE'S ALLEYS GOING AWAY. THE RIGHT OF WAY IS GOING AWAY. SO I, I WOULD RECOMMEND I THINK WE HAVE THE CONDITIONS IN PLACE TO COVER THE ISSUES AND WILL WORK WITH BOTH NEIGHBORS BEFORE IT GOES TO COUNCIL, MAKE SURE THAT'S ALL RESOLVED. BUT I WOULD RECOMMEND, YOU KNOW, MOVING THIS FORWARD SINCE WE'VE ALREADY CONTINUED IT A COUPLE TIMES TO COUNCIL. AND IF THERE'S ANY ISSUE WITH WHERE THE FENCE IS PLACED, IF IT'S INCORRECTLY PLACED, THAT CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH THE CITY TO MAKE SURE THAT'S CORRECT. YEAH. THERE. THE THERE THE, THE BUILDING, YOU KNOW, THE BUILDING PERMITS AND THE INSPECTIONS FOR THE, THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY ARE STILL, YOU KNOW, NEED TO BE APPROVED. AND WE CAN MAKE SURE ALL THAT IS RESOLVED BEFORE WE ISSUE ANY FINAL APPROVALS FOR THE BUILDING. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THIS ITEM OR IN OPPOSITION? OKAY. HEARING NONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I MOVE THAT WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS. SECOND, A MOTION BY MR. SMITH. SECOND, BY MR. EMBRY, PLEASE PULL THE COMMISSION. ALAN. ELLIS. YES. EMBRY. YES. INGRAM. YES. LOZANO. YES.SALOME. YES. SMITH. YES. COLE. YES. RODRIGUEZ. YES, MA'AM. IF YOU'LL JUST STAY TILL AFTER THE MEETING, WE WOULD LOVE TO GET YOUR CONTACT INFORMATION TO THE CITY STAFF. OKAY. MOVING ON TO SUBDIVISIONS FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE POLLS EDITION. WHAT IS CITY STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION? IS THERE, MISTER CHAIR? MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAT. LOTS ONE THROUGH SIX, BLOCK ONE OF THE POLLS EDITION IN THE ETJ STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE PLAT AND RECOMMENDS APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS. I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE ON ANY OF THE CONDITIONS WE ARE RECOMMENDING. THANK YOU. IS THE APPLICANT OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVE HERE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THIS ITEM? ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THIS ITEM? HEARING NONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ENTERTAIN A MOTION MOVE THAT WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS. SECOND, A MOTION BY MR. SMITH. SECOND BY MISS SALOME. PLEASE PULL THE COMMISSION. ALAN. ELLIS. YES. EMBRY. YES. INGRAM. YES. LOZANO. YES. RODRIGUEZ. YES. SALOME.
YES. SMITH. YES. COLE. YES. LAST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA. NUMBER SIX, ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS TO CITY STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION. YES, SIR. MR. CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 28, ZONING TO REMOVE SECTION 2890, CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FROM CHAPTER 28 AND MOVING SAID SECTION TO CHAPTER SIX, WHICH IS THE BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS. THIS IS MAINLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ALIGNING THE THE REGULATIONS THAT ARE MORE APPROPRIATE WITH CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY THAT DEAL WITH BUILDINGS INSTEAD OF ZONING, WHICH DEAL MORE WITH LAND USE AND SITE DEVELOPMENT. AND STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS CHANGE. IS THERE ANYONE PRESENT THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THIS ITEM? ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION HEARING NONE. WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ENTERTAIN A MOTION. MAKE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL. SECOND.
OKAY. MOTION BY MR. ELLIS. A SECOND BY MR. LOZANO. PLEASE PULL THE COMMISSION. ALAN.
ELLIS. YES. EMBRY. YES. INGRAM. YES. LOZANO. YES. RODRIGUEZ. YES. SALOME. YES. SMITH. YES.
OH, YES. WE WILL ADJOURN THE MEET
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.